Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:33:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:33:57 -0400 Received: from [62.245.135.174] ([62.245.135.174]:3508 "EHLO mail.teraport.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:33:56 -0400 From: "Martin.Knoblauch" Reply-To: Martin.Knoblauch@teraport.de Organization: TeraPort GmbH To: pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de Subject: Re: If you want kbuild 2.5, tell Linus Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 19:33:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200206031933.50389.Martin.Knoblauch@teraport.de> X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 06/03/2002 07:33:50 PM, Serialize by Router on lotus/Teraport/de(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 06/03/2002 07:33:56 PM, Serialize complete at 06/03/2002 07:33:56 PM Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > And you and Daniel are right: kbuild seems already on its way > (with help of Kai). now my/the questions are: - is what Kai is doing really leading to kbuild2.5 - how man iterations will it take, will it be ready for 2.6 (whenenvwer that is). - at what point will the kbuild-users have to learn new tricks, where is the point of no-return? Martin -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch | email: Martin.Knoblauch@TeraPort.de TeraPort GmbH | Phone: +49-89-510857-309 C+ITS | Fax: +49-89-510857-111 http://www.teraport.de | Mobile: +49-170-4904759 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/