Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 15:08:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 15:08:14 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:35534 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 15:06:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 12:06:53 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Matti Aarnio Cc: "Holzrichter, Bruce" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: please kindly get back to me Message-ID: <20020603120653.C4940@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Matti Aarnio , "Holzrichter, Bruce" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <61DB42B180EAB34E9D28346C11535A783A7801@nocmail101.ma.tmpw.net> <20020603220046.D18899@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:00:46PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: > Anti-spam technology really needs constant evolution, as those > spammers do evolve themselves... If ever there was something which was screaming for an open source project, it's spam filtering. It seems like every major mailing list has someone like Matti, working really hard on a thankless task, but losing out under the tide of new spam every day. Seems to me if there was a public repository (sourceforge, bkbits, whatever) with a collection of procmail filters which have been shown to work correctly, that would be a win. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/