Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761435Ab0HMJ5S (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 05:57:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40353 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761413Ab0HMJ5P (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 05:57:15 -0400 Message-ID: <4C651800.6030804@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 12:01:36 +0200 From: Hans de Goede User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giel van Schijndel CC: Laurens Leemans , Jonathan Cameron , Randy Dunlap , Jean Delvare , Andrew Morton , Mark Brown , Samuel Ortiz , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: f71882fg: Add support for the Fintek F71808E References: <20100801132226.GE3711@salidar.me.mortis.eu> <1280669402-31213-1-git-send-email-me@mortis.eu> <4C5950B6.5010503@redhat.com> <20100810191117.GN14382@salidar.me.mortis.eu> In-Reply-To: <20100810191117.GN14382@salidar.me.mortis.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1487 Lines: 40 Hi, On 08/10/2010 09:11 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 01:36:22PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On 08/01/2010 03:30 PM, Giel van Schijndel wrote: >>> Allow device probing to recognise the Fintek F71808E. >>> >>> Sysfs interface: >>> * Fan/pwm control is the same as for F71889FG >> >> My datasheet strongly disagrees with this ... > > I just noticed this patch was applied to mainline anyway. Regardless, I > will (try to) address these issues you raised. > > Right now however, I am prioritising personal stuff above this > driver---bachelor's thesis and graduation presentation. When finished > with that (september) I'll allocate time to these issues again. > I've send a mail directly to akpm asking for this to be removed, hopefully this will help. > PPS I do have a patch ready that addresses some of the issues you > raised. Those are only the cosmetic changes though (e.g. change > naming of chip, comment updates, etc.). Would you suggest me to > send it right now already or wait until I have time to address the > other issues as well? My goal for 2.6.36 is to pull the patch, and then we can wait til all issues are fixed properly before re-introducing it. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/