Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934318Ab0HMNC1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:02:27 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:49660 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934276Ab0HMNCY (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:02:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4C654100.3060307@vlnb.net> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:56:32 +0400 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100527 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: jaxboe@fusionio.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, James.Bottomley@suse.de, tytso@mit.edu, chris.mason@oracle.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp, dm-devel@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, rwheeler@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, Christoph Hellwig , Nick Piggin , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Chris Wright Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] block: kill QUEUE_ORDERED_BY_TAG References: <1281616891-5691-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1281616891-5691-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1281616891-5691-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:bLG0yymJNm4qTbpIgfAg+NxiWsk4bcOoBTJB4Bh6AVJ bXnnjQ0g8ex+ji0oZ5eXS4YyohgcvCc9C4xyQ/8ZWrjyeyrxM4 tPcRvaIUcschR83R7Hqqsdi/3vqGzVBSXn/lnGI2RUr83g/bRL gAXFQB9Wf3CMW2OChGqk++BTqPEWUOCqv2T+BKCP022AnZ2efz 95nzUc1s7gooflABGCuFw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 20 Hello Tejun, Tejun Heo, on 08/12/2010 04:41 PM wrote: > Nobody is making meaningful use of ORDERED_BY_TAG now and queue > draining for barrier requests will be removed soon which will render > the advantage of tag ordering moot. Have you seen Hannes Reinecke's and my measurements in http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128110662528485&w=2 and http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=128111995217405&w=2 correspondingly? If yes, what else evidences do you need to see that the tag ordering is a big performance win? Vlad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/