Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 15:43:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 15:43:39 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:22533 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 15:43:38 -0400 Message-ID: <3CFBC6DD.9040805@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 12:43:25 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Zytor Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020524 X-Accept-Language: en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thunder from the hill CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: isofs unhide option: troubles with Wine In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thunder from the hill wrote: > Hi, > > On 3 Jun 2002, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >>No, I think that's a bad idea. Make them listed, but make it possible >>to query the attribute flags. > > > So you suggest letting ls do the hide? Or if not, what do we call them > "hidden" for? > I don't think it makes any sense for anything in Unix to hide them at all. The "hidden" flag, however, matters to programs like Wine. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/