Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934563Ab0HMP23 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:28:29 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:56779 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934495Ab0HMP22 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:28:28 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=h5VpXMDJ2zQVPAfdtaOwwQFJ3w/FcS/2uYW1YiSUG/zWxfBI0KN1m86pDdklmU0zlV pbRcvFbgpCw22cFOKPUCISbme+3Gee77UN8jIvv/lKJ8wqqgjAyUVwmnt+h7Iykn6+v0 w12Diue9lzPIUHwkSY89dLQ63cED1uWnz1Dpg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100813151451.GC2511@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20100809181638.GI3026@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100809201822.441905f7@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100810044541.GA2817@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100810093849.138e2318@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100811004223.GH2379@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100811221258.GI2516@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100812161935.GC2524@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100813151451.GC2511@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:28:27 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three From: Felipe Contreras To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Alan Cox , "Ted Ts'o" , david@lang.hm, Brian Swetland , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arve@android.com, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, pavel@ucw.cz, florian@mickler.org, rjw@sisk.pl, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, menage@google.com, david-b@pacbell.net, James.Bottomley@suse.de, arjan@infradead.org, swmike@swm.pp.se, galibert@pobox.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1037 Lines: 23 On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:52:22PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >>  4) no, we can't say anything about what opportunistic suspend means in practice > > Here I disagree.  The Android folks have used it for quite some time. > We might not be able to apply their experience directly to other software > stacks, but we should nevertheless be able to learn quite a bit from it. So when it comes to practice you are relying solely on what Android people say. If it's true that it's easy to spot the "PM-driving applications", then it shouldn't be hard for a guy from the Android team to assemble a basic typical system (X.org, dbus, etc.) with suspend-blockers in a couple of days. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/