Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, yehuda@hq.newdream.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] rados block device and ceph refactor
In-Reply-To: <20100813153706.ee61c94e.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008131609270.5383@cobra.newdream.net>
References: <1281721240-26130-1-git-send-email-sage@newdream.net>
 <20100813153706.ee61c94e.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1282
Lines: 30

On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:40:32 -0700 Sage Weil wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The rados block device (rbd) implements a network block device backed by 
> > the Ceph distributed object store (think nbd/iSCSI, but distributed and 
> > fault tolerant).  At the suggestion of Christoph and James, this version 
> > of the patchset factors out the common Ceph bits (the network protocol, 
> > cluster membership, and object storage parts) into a libceph module 
> > (currently in net/ceph/ and include/linux/ceph/) that is shared by the 
> > file system component (fs/ceph) and rbd (drivers/block/rbd.c). The first 
> > few patches lay some groundwork, #7 moves does the ceph -> libceph+ceph 
> > split, and #8 adds the block device driver.
> 
> Hi,
> Did patch #7 make it to any mailing lists?
> I didn't receive it.

Sorry, I think vger ate it (it's 850KB).  You can see it here:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client.git;a=commit;h=a6da68196474aabcdcc2f5dab64c0b55ca5090b7

sage

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/