Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756677Ab0HNAsE (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:48:04 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:52788 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753529Ab0HNAsC (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:48:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:47:29 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Grant Coady , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable-review@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [0/3] 2.6.27.52 stable review Message-ID: <20100814004729.GA3695@suse.de> References: <20100813214704.GA18960@kroah.com> <20100813230712.GA1703@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1029 Lines: 28 On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:12:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Grant Coady wrote: > > > > Machine is running, but there's a lot of these in the dmesg: > > > > WARNING: at include/linux/security.h:1826 acct_stack_growth+0xe7/0xf0() > > That would seem to be because of the lack of commit 05fa199d45c in > 2.6.27. It got marked for stable, but probably never went so far back > as 2.6.27. Yup, I didn't include it there. Grant, if you add that, does the warning go away? > That said, I do wonder if it is worth it maintaining a 2.6.27 that the > maintainer can't even boot on his machines any more. Yeah, I'm beginning to wonder about it as well. I think it's expected lifespan is very near to the end. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/