Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:51:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:51:00 -0400 Received: from smtp-dom.radiant.net ([66.163.205.65]:53171 "HELO smtp-auth1.radiant.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:50:59 -0400 Message-ID: <004301c20b41$696c9a20$0100007f@localdomain.wni.com.wirelessnetworksinc.com> From: "Herman Oosthuysen" To: "Larry McVoy" , "Matti Aarnio" Cc: "Holzrichter, Bruce" , In-Reply-To: <61DB42B180EAB34E9D28346C11535A783A7801@nocmail101.ma.tmpw.net> <20020603220046.D18899@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <20020603120653.C4940@work.bitmover.com> Subject: Re: please kindly get back to me Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 14:58:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have confirmed with the Canadian CRTC, that we have no explicit laws or regulations for the control of spam and that the CRTC has no plans to get involved, even though they have the legal authority to do so. Basically, they gave me the go ahead to retaliate against spammers, since neither spam nor anti-spam is regulated. There are various procmail recipes for the control of spam. The trick is to create general purpose recipes that are not tied to specific spammers/messages. The Spambouncer is a set of recipes that will generate a reply message to spam and I am doing something similar on my own site. If I receive spam, I send it back. If everybody would do that, then it might have some effect. What we really need however, is active anti-spamming. We need system that will subscribe them to each other's mailing lists on an ongoing basis. If they like spam so much, then they can send it to each other. I have started to do this by collecting the e-mail addresses of spammers. I then put them in invisible mailto: links on my web site for spammer spiders to harvest. A while ago, AOL returned all spam in batches back to the originators, causing their servers to crash. A spammer sued, and AOL won. If anyone is interested in starting Yet Another Procmail Spambouncer, then you can count me in. Cheers, -- Herman Oosthuysen Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com Suite 300, #3016, 5th Ave NE, Calgary, Alberta, T2A 6K4, Canada Phone: (403) 569-5687, Fax: (403) 235-3965 ----- Original Message ----- From: Larry McVoy To: Matti Aarnio Cc: Holzrichter, Bruce ; Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:06 PM Subject: Re: please kindly get back to me > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:00:46PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: > > Anti-spam technology really needs constant evolution, as those > > spammers do evolve themselves... > > If ever there was something which was screaming for an open source project, > it's spam filtering. It seems like every major mailing list has someone > like Matti, working really hard on a thankless task, but losing out under > the tide of new spam every day. Seems to me if there was a public repository > (sourceforge, bkbits, whatever) with a collection of procmail filters which > have been shown to work correctly, that would be a win. > -- > --- > Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/