Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:55:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:55:17 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:15878 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:55:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 17:54:49 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Larry McVoy cc: Matti Aarnio , "Holzrichter, Bruce" , Subject: Re: please kindly get back to me In-Reply-To: <20020603120653.C4940@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 10:00:46PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: > > Anti-spam technology really needs constant evolution, as those > > spammers do evolve themselves... > > If ever there was something which was screaming for an open source project, > it's spam filtering. It seems like every major mailing list has someone > like Matti, working really hard on a thankless task, but losing out under > the tide of new spam every day. Seems to me if there was a public repository > (sourceforge, bkbits, whatever) with a collection of procmail filters which > have been shown to work correctly, that would be a win. http://spamfilter.nl.linux.org/ ;) and of course spamassassin and the dnsbl lists... Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/