Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756981Ab0HNP2l (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:28:41 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:63234 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751274Ab0HNP2k (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:28:40 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=nS2f+OWH7jjkU5MVhHftok7Nvur7TkAiosVxYRAeC9HeDCHebI2oZHiTX2QUNje1wz KOITozTtWM0n/G2FAZeQ7u/aH/nfpFB/yDd7RfpS/VVYsjTnqXLh7LNfaN/y8ZwC6i8Z 6E1dEaBk5V54WKhkRadPbWRZsPqESTgjL+/RQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20100814134343.GD17430@suse.de> References: <20100814134343.GD17430@suse.de> Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:28:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Call traces w/ 2.6.35.2 (not w/ 2.6.35.1 plus 2.6.35.2-rc1) From: Sedat Dilek To: Greg KH Cc: LKML , wylda@volny.cz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1452 Lines: 43 On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 08:36:30AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hope this helps to give an overview what has changed: [...] > > I still fail to understand what you are trying to show here at all. > > confused, > > greg k-h > I was trying to show you that the patches in .35.2-rc1 and .35.2 are not the same. Normally, the rcX patches become the final ones. Unfortunately, I was too lazy to check the names of the patches and simply compared the files that have been modified (lines beginning with "diff --git a/file b/file"). In the meantime, Mr./Mrs.(?) "wylda" (sorry, don't know if first or last name) bisected the problem [1]. The confusing part for me is why "fresh" upstream patches entered a 2.6.35.y fix-series. I can't say if only i386 is concerned, but as mm: fix missing page table unmap for stack guard page failure case mm: keep a guard page below a grow-down stack segment are also upstream patches, I think the both cause problems for .35-gitX also [2]. - Sedat - [1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16588 [2] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16588#c5 [3] [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/14/54 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/