Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757880Ab0HNSqU (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:46:20 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:46956 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754788Ab0HNSqT (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:46:19 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:46:05 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: khc@pm.waw.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: ARM: 2.6.3[45] PCI regression (IXP4xx and PXA?) Message-ID: <20100814184605.GA1999@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20100811072532.GA21511@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100813152224H.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20100813215413.GA21607@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20100814181306U.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100814181306U.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1427 Lines: 33 On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:30:37PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:54:13 +0100 > Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > This means that when dmabounce comes to allocate the replacement > > buffer, it gets a buffer which won't be accessible to the DMA > > controller > > Really? looks like dmabounce does nothing for coherent memory that > dma_alloc_coherent() allocates. > > The following very hacky patch works? So what happens if you use a driver which uses dma_alloc_coherent() directly? Should the driver really be passed memory which is inaccessible to the device because its outside the host bridge PCI window? No, this is clearly wrong, so this patch doesn't fix anything. It's a bodge, nothing more. The real solution is to have _both_ masks both reduced down according to the host bridge, as we used to do. So I suggest 6fee48c is reverted so that these platforms don't regress for -rc1. As I said when you sent the originally patch, it _looked_ okay, but I don't have any way to test it. It seems from testing (which unfortunately only seems to only happen after patches hit mainline) that it is not okay after all. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/