From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: piotr@hosowicz.com
Subject: Re: ioctl definition - has it changed recently?
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:17:22 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-rc4-next-20100709+; KDE/4.4.92; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <4C67023D.6050603@example.com> <201008160858.42947.arnd@arndb.de> <4C68E4A5.3050800@example.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C68E4A5.3050800@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201008160917.23260.arnd@arndb.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 717
Lines: 19

On Monday 16 August 2010 09:11:33 Piotr Hosowicz wrote:
> > and then make it use the unlocked_ioctl operation.
> 
> This I do not know. Can You help me?
> 

Just take a look at all the other patches that went into the
kernel to do this for other drivers. You only really
need to change the line with .ioctl=... to .unlocked_ioctl=
and change the prototype of the referenced function to

static long foo_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/