From: Lei Wen <leiwen@marvell.com>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
CC: Haojian Zhuang <hzhuang1@marvell.com>, Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:03:11 -0700
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] pxa3xx: fix timing and cmdset for
 samsung2GbX8
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] pxa3xx: fix timing and cmdset for
 samsung2GbX8
Thread-Index: Acs9SrN/qt+bvrxLS0i9q5GHxhnxMAAADXfQ
Message-ID: <53612FE6B944314AAADB181E45A45B64133DDFC162@sc-vexch3.marvell.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikCO505BZfqQGsRAdLgMa9hBQZ8YS-hJy-1RGg1@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Length: 2074
Lines: 51

Eric,
The first patch is a bit of fundamental. I'm afraid that modify it would bring changes to all latter patches in this series...

So I think I would repost another round of updating patch series and hope that would be merged. How do you think about this?

Thanks,
Lei


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Miao [mailto:eric.y.miao@gmail.com] 
Sent: 2010??8??16?? 21:55
To: David Woodhouse
Cc: Haojian Zhuang; Lei Wen; Axel Lin; linux-kernel; linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MTD] [NAND] pxa3xx: fix timing and cmdset for samsung2GbX8

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:05 PM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:55 +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Haojian Zhuang <hzhuang1@marvell.com> wrote:
>> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2010-July/subject.html
>> >
>> > They're re-posted in July. Please search the subjects in that page. They're totally 29 patches.
>> >
>> > By the way, David, what's the result of review on these patches? We already posted for several times.
>> >
>>
>> I've actually reviewed some of the patches and gave my Ack. For those
>> patches, I think they can be merged early.
>>
>> And overall, they look good. Yet 29 patch in a whole is still a bit too
>> much, would be good to see them logically be separated into several
>> patch series.
>
> You had some criticism of patch #1 in the sequence, and some questions.
>

So they need to be addressed. Lei, could you please come up with
an updated patch?

> I didn't look much harder than that, iirc... although looking back now
> it seems that the rest of your responses to the sequence were largely
> positive.
>
> Are you happy with the first patch, and if so shall I go ahead and
> import the whole sequence with your Acked-By:?
>

I'm generally OK, but still think it would be good to have another around
of review before they can be merged.
????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?