Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757600Ab0HQPFt (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:05:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:55397 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755508Ab0HQPFr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:05:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=qiGLEvYbqFJ9QFKNPcpEVdjAd70JwlOgX2JJLnFm17/DfXIIllbhZOuw/1VHN79qna XXF9RTkQowPsThLka4ZncGil/qs2J6P6EYogh+iTYMi35DM6T7W8zC/RYbTrq80K3DHY fdpG48KCgUA8UVhXk7GwuVuDKeSNxAecgHGj0= Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: remove RELOC_HIDE on __pa_symbol From: Namhyung Kim To: Ralf Baechle Cc: David Daney , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Daney , linux-mips@linux-mips.org In-Reply-To: <20100817150035.GC17861@linux-mips.org> References: <1281297456-2711-1-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com> <4C5F8ED8.90301@gmail.com> <20100809122147.GA23053@linux-mips.org> <1281409628.1670.11.camel@leonhard> <20100817150035.GC17861@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:05:35 +0900 Message-ID: <1282057535.1635.10.camel@leonhard> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 937 Lines: 29 2010-08-17 (화), 16:00 +0100, Ralf Baechle: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:07:08PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > I've sent basically same patch to x86 folks [1] and they said there is a > > possiblility of miscompilation on gcc 3. I am not sure the same goes > > here on mips but it might be safer to keep it. Sorry for the noise ;-( > > > > [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/8/138 > > So in a distant future when GCC 3.x will finally be retired we will be > able to apply this patch, sigh. I'll drop your patch for the time being > and add a comment to the code. > > Thanks! > > Ralf FYI, the exact version introduced -f[no-]strict-overlow was gcc 4.2. -- Regards, Namhyung Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/