Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757914Ab0HQQWs (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:22:48 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:36852 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754223Ab0HQQWr (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:22:47 -0400 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <4C6AB741.9050804@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:22:25 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20100627 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: Peter Zijlstra , linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: lockdep false positive? -- firewire-core transaction timer vs. scsi-core host lock References: <1281994939.1926.2075.camel@laptop> <1281997633.3683.50.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> In-Reply-To: <1281997633.3683.50.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 601 Lines: 16 Johannes Berg wrote: > I'm convinced it's a false positive though, question is how to shut it > up :-) Is there anyway to differentiate the lockdep naming of shost->host_lock (initialized in scsi_host_alloc) at runtime by means of the scsi_host_template instance given to scsi_host_alloc? -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- =--- =---= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/