Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:29:48 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [S+Q3 00/23] SLUB: The Unified slab allocator (V3)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008171217440.11915@router.home>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008171229070.12188@router.home>
References: <20100804024514.139976032@linux.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008032138160.20049@chino.kir.corp.google.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008041115500.11084@router.home> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008050136340.30889@chino.kir.corp.google.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008051231400.6787@router.home>
 <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008151627450.27137@chino.kir.corp.google.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008171217440.11915@router.home>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 707
Lines: 17

On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > I'm really curious why nobody else ran into this problem before,
> > especially if they have CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG enabled so
> > struct kmem_cache_node has the same size.  Perhaps my early bug report
> > caused people not to test the series...
>
> Which patches were applied?


If you do not apply all patches then you can be at a stage were
kmalloc_caches[0] is still used for kmem_cache_node. Then things break.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/