Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 05:44:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 05:44:09 -0400 Received: from zikova.cvut.cz ([147.32.235.100]:34312 "EHLO zikova.cvut.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 05:44:09 -0400 From: "Petr Vandrovec" Organization: CC CTU Prague To: "Brian C. Huffman" Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 11:43:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: kernel routing of IPSec / VMWare CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.50 Message-ID: <71CBDC94409@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4 Jun 02 at 1:19, Brian C. Huffman wrote: > > The way that we have checkpoint setup it is doing UDP encapsulation of > the IPSec (otherwise it would not be possible to do this w/ NAT). This > is with all the latest 2.4 kernels (haven't tried 2.4.19, though). Can't you push packets over your eth0 MTU with this encapsulation? It would be useful if you could do 'tcpdump -i vmnet8 & tcpdump -i eth0' or 'tcpdump -i any' to find what's going on. Petr Vandrovec vandrove@vc.cvut.cz P.S.: Did you tried to ask in VMware newsgroups? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/