Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752806Ab0HRBtF (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:49:05 -0400 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:14673 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751492Ab0HRBs6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Aug 2010 21:48:58 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6077"; a="51251125" Message-ID: <4C6B3C09.7010809@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:48:57 -0700 From: Bryan Huntsman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Igor Stoppa , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Linux-pm mailing list , kernel list Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Wakelocks Rebooted - Power management for embedded devices References: <1282034436.13642.1115.camel@vimes.research.nokia.com> <201008171550.06753.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <201008171550.06753.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 865 Lines: 20 >> * I would welcome people from silicon companies to participate in the >> discussion, since they have the best understanding of the real impact of >> a certain power saving implementation on the SoC performance. > > Yes, it would be nice to have some input from the hardware folks. Speaking for the Qualcomm MSM folks, we definitely would like to be more active in power management discussions. I'm hoping to get some of our power experts to attend LPC this year. - Bryan -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/