Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751190Ab0HRHDM (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 03:03:12 -0400 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:34505 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750757Ab0HRHDH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 03:03:07 -0400 From: "Gopinath, Thara" To: "felipe.balbi@nokia.com" CC: Samuel Ortiz , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Tony Lindgren , Andrew Morton Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:32:53 +0530 Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h Thread-Topic: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h Thread-Index: Acs+ouRnZlZKFP6gQGCjQ3KrZujyxAAAD0Fw Message-ID: <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB03242222C6@dbde02.ent.ti.com> References: <1282112377-1335-1-git-send-email-felipe.balbi@nokia.com> <1282112377-1335-3-git-send-email-felipe.balbi@nokia.com> <5A47E75E594F054BAF48C5E4FC4B92AB032422229C@dbde02.ent.ti.com> <20100818065905.GC11947@nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <20100818065905.GC11947@nokia.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1192 Lines: 28 >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:felipe.balbi@nokia.com] >>Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 12:29 PM >>To: Gopinath, Thara >>Cc: Balbi Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki); Samuel Ortiz; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- >>omap@vger.kernel.org; Tony Lindgren; Andrew Morton >>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: twl-core: switch over to defines in twl.h >> >>On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:32:57AM +0200, ext Gopinath, Thara wrote: >>>R_PROTECT_KEY offset is 0xE where as the new TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY >>>is defined as 0xd. I have not checked the trm to see which is correct. But >> >>you can use either 0xc0|0x0c or 0xce|0xec, both will work are unlock >>keys. No I am not talking about the key values. I was talking about the register offset for TWL4030_PM_MASTER_PROTECT_KEY. My question is, is it ok for it to be 0xd or 0xe. Earlier we were using 0xd and in the new implementation it has been changed to 0xe. Regards Thara -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/