Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753908Ab0HRPM7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:12:59 -0400 Received: from n3a.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.66]:25613 "HELO n3a.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752952Ab0HRPM6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:12:58 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 121146.78525.bm@omp115.mail.gq1.yahoo.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=zBfffoYj6lh3x54fiU0sAhmyru5IahcVp79V8nF7U85WCmxEPmAHmySDu146kRd27uMajgfeYWk4z7aQwqAIpOOjJ0rR75/FXFrtRZMNxxtHngLN+7HuvbkdX/W31BJmHf+/9mU5wk4EmsjpvL2X9D+kdCLwwZzS6L9vfOzmFt0=; Message-ID: <976203.51076.qm@web111913.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 9ZESxloVM1k4dMiTgbSfvNFuuhCdsjf47UcxLNSJMtw.2gb 0XXU_7UBHvLnVa0MoNZHYABMrfaLUEfDA2Hf_nlaLFbmwfQFpWEZqyAbLx9q OpODg7bvqkxbnnk.MGNO0d1FnDZsZ4vbOsRuZbf0h4.TpAoVlCX2P4bg4YBT VL0ZzGifFMGe.MUT.2Fa912QbOG2qKlhWASho0GlGF_dXh4EKCl6nU.exNxx br8cbtbQ1cWclaUB8pwrx5BUa7hpuYBJbJ11pnmeE2WH.GPwJyCnIwm8YcGp .mhGcnLGtBYXCD.dr0G4A_v1dCXk_zleCqD2MC3kDv8WCeuUaqE5Rt6Tdt1X btDP1Y0pyqXcanXg- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 08:12:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Chetan Loke Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010... To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin , James Bottomley Cc: scst-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <594039.74663.qm@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3413 Lines: 113 Ok, pls ignore my first question: I was trying to access https://lwn.net/Articles/399148/ But I just read: http://lwn.net/Articles/400589/ Chetan --- On Wed, 8/18/10, Chetan Loke wrote: > From: Chetan Loke > Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010... > To: "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" , "James Bottomley" > Cc: "scst-devel" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2010, 2:58 PM > Hello James and others, > > --- On Tue, 8/17/10, James Bottomley > wrote: > > > From: James Bottomley > > Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re:? linuxcon 2010... > > To: "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" > > Cc: "scst-devel" , > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, > linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > > Date: Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 8:30 PM > > On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 20:20 +0400, > > Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > > > Hello James, > > > > > > Could you comment rumors that decision about > future > > Linux SCSI target > > > subsystem is done as well as other related > rumors: > > > > If this is related to LSF, the notes on the I/O track > are > > here: > > > > http://lwn.net/Articles/400491/ > > > During the open panel, my question was really specific - > > Q) What is the future of a SCSI-target subsystem in linux. > Which > ???target engine/subsystem can we expect? > > Your answer) There is place for only 1 target-subsystem in > the Linux scsi stack and in the LSF summit the decision was > taken to merge LIO. Has that > decision changed since the summit? > > As a scst-user what I would like to understand is, what was > that decision based on? Because the LSF summit was 'small by > invitation' only summit. The notes don't give us an insight > on the selection criteria/merits etc. > > > > > > > 3. I have heard you said "Vlad wasn't comfortable > in > > handing up the > > > control to the maintainers ... (this is how > kernel.org > > works)." I have > > > no idea what you meant. I have never been asked > about > > anything like > > > that, so I couldn't say anyhow that I'm not > > comfortable with anything. > > > Could you clarify that? > > > > > 3) above is something that I emailed Vlad and the scst > community based on our offline conversation after the open > panel. If SCST really has licensing issues then I will > personally stop using SCST. Since Vlad hasn't > expressed any concerns on the above and neither have you > commented on it, is it safe to assume that the licensing > requirement is a non-issue? > > > Chetan Loke > > > > ? ? ? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Scst-devel mailing list > Scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scst-devel > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/