Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752287Ab0HRRue (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:50:34 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:54404 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752022Ab0HRRub (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:50:31 -0400 Message-ID: <4C6C1D70.7020502@vlnb.net> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:50:40 +0400 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100527 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Bottomley CC: Chetan Loke , Chetan Loke , scst-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Scst-devel] Fwd: Re: linuxcon 2010... References: <594039.74663.qm@web111905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1282144271.3035.31.camel@mulgrave.site> <1282148296.3035.49.camel@mulgrave.site> In-Reply-To: <1282148296.3035.49.camel@mulgrave.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:UN6qw8hZ9s/X4LFM1xkSFh9LUgWch+01DoPg39+y7Te oIDKyjL2M0eNzwY+hJeApatyf93O135jTB1e5bYgzdLt09lAr0 dxKqBAgfysQbp1Gtq1SsW/oYKrUIWxDVGmsLlYZgn75e03PYF3 06Cpnj1pCbxfD6RVymczcnNWcSmchgLiWuVge0EataeXgV7vsU hxzEeynTt+npB40CFqBOA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1586 Lines: 32 James Bottomley, on 08/18/2010 08:18 PM wrote: >> James you are an expert but not everyone is. This is not a venting >> session but even folks who are new to target architecture find it easy >> to hack SCST. > > But that's not really relevant, is it? I would expect that whatever I > do, even keeping both out of tree, the communities around the solutions > would still exist and be vibrant, since they're out of tree now, nothing > will have changed. The problem that people do believe that the merged code is the best code, so the being merged is an immediate HUGE advertisement. So, you can't say if a code is inside the mainline tree or not isn't relevant. This is the source of the questions from the SCST community. SCST is at the moment the best code. It's several years ahead any competitor. SCST has more functionality, SCST has more users, SCST has bigger community, SCST has more testing and, hence, stability, SCST has more support from storage vendors, etc. But for some reasons all those suddenly ignored and a raw, pursuing SCST code preferred instead. So, we want to know those reasons. SCST wasn't even really considered. Isn't Linux anymore a place where the best code wins? Frankly, it looks like the decision was done under closed doors based on rather political reasons, like personal connections... Vlad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/