Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:21:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:21:31 -0400 Received: from arsenal.visi.net ([206.246.194.60]:11926 "EHLO visi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:21:30 -0400 X-Virus-Scanner: McAfee Virus Engine Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 09:13:32 -0400 From: Ben Collins To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , andreas.bombe@munich.netsurf.de, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] disable CONFIG_IEEE1394_PCILYNX_PORTS config option Message-ID: <20020604131332.GI1250@blimpo.internal.net> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:19:19AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Hi Marcelo, > > IMHO it gives a bad picture of the quality of Linux if a stable kernel > contains options that doesn't compile. CONFIG_IEEE1394_PCILYNX_PORTS > doesn't compile (the error message is at the end of the mail) and Andreas > Bombe stated in a private mail to me four months ago that it shouldn't > have been a public option. > > My patch doesn't do any harm because currently the kernel doesn't compile > when this option is enabled and if someone fixes pcilynx.c it's pretty > trivial to revert this patch. We've already done this locally in our repo. Go ahead and apply this patch if you want. Ben -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://linux1394.sourceforge.net/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/