Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751942Ab0HTCe0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:34:26 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:57577 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750817Ab0HTCeY (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:34:24 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,236,1280732400"; d="scan'208";a="547022969" Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:34:19 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Michael Rubin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, jack@suse.cz, riel@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@fromorbit.com, npiggin@suse.de, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: helper functions for dirty and writeback accounting Message-ID: <20100820023419.GA5502@localhost> References: <1282251447-16937-1-git-send-email-mrubin@google.com> <1282251447-16937-2-git-send-email-mrubin@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1282251447-16937-2-git-send-email-mrubin@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4423 Lines: 119 On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:57:25PM -0700, Michael Rubin wrote: > Exporting account_pages_dirty and adding a symmetric routine > account_pages_writeback. s/account_pages_writeback/account_page_writeback/ I'd recommend to separate the changes into two patches. It's actually a bug fix to export account_pages_dirty() for ceph, which should be a good candidate for 2.6.36. > This allows code outside of the mm core to safely manipulate page state > and not worry about the other accounting. Not using these routines means > that some code will lose track of the accounting and we get bugs. This > has happened once already. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Rubin > --- > fs/ceph/addr.c | 8 ++------ > fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 2 +- > include/linux/mm.h | 1 + > mm/page-writeback.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c > index d9c60b8..359aa3a 100644 > --- a/fs/ceph/addr.c > +++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c > @@ -106,12 +106,8 @@ static int ceph_set_page_dirty(struct page *page) > if (page->mapping) { /* Race with truncate? */ > WARN_ON_ONCE(!PageUptodate(page)); > > - if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) { > - __inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY); > - __inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, > - BDI_RECLAIMABLE); > - task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); > - } > + if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) That 'if' is not necessary. account_page_dirtied() already has one. The extra 'if' is not an optimization either, because the ceph fs is not likely to have un-accountable mappings. > + account_page_dirtied(page, page->mapping); > radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree, > page_index(page), PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY); > > diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c > index c920164..967ed7d 100644 > --- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c > +++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c > @@ -1599,7 +1599,7 @@ nilfs_copy_replace_page_buffers(struct page *page, struct list_head *out) > kunmap_atomic(kaddr, KM_USER0); > > if (!TestSetPageWriteback(clone_page)) > - inc_zone_page_state(clone_page, NR_WRITEBACK); > + account_page_writeback(clone_page, page_mapping(clone_page)); > unlock_page(clone_page); > > return 0; > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h > index a2b4804..b138392 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mm.h > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h > @@ -855,6 +855,7 @@ int __set_page_dirty_no_writeback(struct page *page); > int redirty_page_for_writepage(struct writeback_control *wbc, > struct page *page); > void account_page_dirtied(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping); > +void account_page_writeback(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping); > int set_page_dirty(struct page *page); > int set_page_dirty_lock(struct page *page); > int clear_page_dirty_for_io(struct page *page); > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c > index 37498ef..b8e7b3b 100644 > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c > @@ -1096,6 +1096,21 @@ void account_page_dirtied(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping) > task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE); > } > } > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_dirtied); > + > +/* > + * Helper function for set_page_writeback family. > + * NOTE: Unlike account_page_dirtied this does not rely on being atomic > + * wrt interrupts. > + */ > + > +void account_page_writeback(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping) > +{ > + if (mapping_cap_account_dirty(mapping)) The 'if' test and *mapping parameter looks unnecessary at least for now. The only place a mapping has BDI_CAP_NO_ACCT_WB but not BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK is fuse, which does its own accounting. Thanks, Fengguang > + inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_WRITEBACK); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_writeback); > + > > /* > * For address_spaces which do not use buffers. Just tag the page as dirty in > -- > 1.7.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/