Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S315210AbSFDQuL>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 12:50:11 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S315232AbSFDQuK>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 12:50:10 -0400
Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:49916 "EHLO
	hermes.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S315210AbSFDQtL>; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 12:49:11 -0400
Subject: Re: linux-2.5.20-ct1
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
        Lightweight patch manager <patch@luckynet.dynu.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
        Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206032239500.3833-100000@hawkeye.luckynet.adm>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) 
Date: 04 Jun 2002 09:48:56 -0700
Message-Id: <1023209337.912.103.camel@sinai>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 21:41, Thunder from the hill wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > Please discard the atomic update patch altogether; there were enough
> > eyebrows raised that this cannot qualify as a simple cleanup.
> 
> Is there something serious to add about them? Is it sure that they won't 
> work or such? Otherwise I'd suggest just getting them tested.

Maybe it is not wise to integrate a tree with patches you do to know are
correct or not?

	Robert Love


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/