Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751939Ab0HTKGY (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 06:06:24 -0400 Received: from smtp127.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.65.186]:46584 "HELO smtp127.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751254Ab0HTKGW (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 06:06:22 -0400 X-Yahoo-SMTP: fzDSGlOswBCWnIOrNw7KwwK1j9PqyNbe5PtLKiS4dDU.UNl_t6bdEZu9tTLW X-YMail-OSG: SwGPWZQVM1kMwSuDzLG.m._FsQ6bZ6ZoppzS0k7F9et8MwJ m1WbH8RIJ_BMlUs6WDQVmUDrsrXGK17JcxhwzqHc6jF.Iy3oKpTDXzIMPim4 SP_exmRqdylnzfF7EpNVTQHQfNYRd3jgvs2_WAg5xT3ZIefuRDtzqNh_AVdG PVJtGodYAbPG6khPLeGZPVQBe.7BtyzzeOG5FyqlttaN0a2jwgf4GPVC_Q58 Reo3VW2z78ZwQGBxv6iLw1p54n2BMsFyXCIW5vvf1tJBe30t9scI7Cjex6r3 4vSAx7qykVF8eRrq4ST9PX9ndP6OuhIz83lkQt4GC5iP06C2hMUJEvzfPuxR XOzLDMyeeK3WFJi0esg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Subject: Re: Conversion of LIO-Target to use include/scsi/iscsi_proto.h defs From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, James.Bottomley@suse.de, hare@suse.de In-Reply-To: <20100820184031L.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> References: <1282257947.30453.296.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20100820163058P.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1282295674.30453.337.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <20100820184031L.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 03:02:40 -0700 Message-Id: <1282298560.30453.370.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1939 Lines: 46 On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 18:41 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 02:14:34 -0700 > "Nicholas A. Bellinger" wrote: > > > I am pretty sure there are more important items to focus on inside from > > this particuarly time-consuming and tedious cleanup, but am happy to > > btw, it would be better to focus on the target core code first rather > than its iscsi target driver? Well, this is what was originally proposed for v2.6.35. But considering the LIO-Target namesake and it's full use of logic from the TCM/ConfigFS v4 design, I believe that hch thought it made sense to include it together moving forward with TCM Core now that we are moving forward together. > The mainline supports only ibm vscsi > target now. So the target core code and its new vscsi driver can be > merged to replace the current mainline target infrastructure and its > vscsi driver, I think. the iscsi target driver is a "new" feature, > which can be added later. No need to merge it with the target core > code (of course, we can merge it together if possible). I can plan to keep the posting of drivers/target/lio-target/ code seperate, and after the upcoming public posting to linux-scsi for your review of TCM core and TCM_Loop. But perhaps at this point LIO-Target should go in together with TCM Core and TCM_Loop once mnc can review the software iSCSI target pieces..? I am very happy to continue in the short term improving the LIO-Target fabric module together with mnc to use mainline code and convention so that we can ensure this piece is included together with TCM Core for v2.6.37. Comments from other Linux/iSCSI folks is apperciated here..! Best, --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/