Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753181Ab0HTPzf (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:55:35 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:41950 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751452Ab0HTPzd (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:55:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1282308887.3170.5439.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> References: <20100818203143.735033743@clark.site> <1282308887.3170.5439.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:54:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [2/3] mm: fix up some user-visible effects of the stack guard page To: Ian Campbell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable-review@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Greg KH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1657 Lines: 35 On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Since we have split the original VMA into 3, shouldn't only the bottom > one still have VM_GROWSDOWN set? (how can the top two grow down with the > bottom one in the way?) Certainly it seems wrong to enforce a guard page > on anything but the bottom VMA (which is what appears to be happening). Yes, it does seem like we should teach vma splitting to remove VM_GROWSDOWN on all but the lowest mapping. > Out of interest how does the guard page interact with processes which do > alloca(N*PAGE_SIZE)? It's a guard page, not magic. Some architecture ABI's specify that if you expand the stack by more than a certain number, you need to touch a page in between (for example, I think alpha had that rule), because they don't grow the stack automatically by an arbitrary amount. But x86 has never had that rule, and you can certainly defeat a guard page by simply accessing by much more than a page. As far as I'm concerned, the guard page thing is not - and shouldn't be thought of - a "hard" feature. If it's needed, it's really a bug in user space. But given that there are bugs in user space, the guard page makes it a bit harder to abuse those bugs. But it's about "a bit harder" rather than anything else. IOW, it does _not_ make up for user space that willfully does crazy things, and never will. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/