Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:50:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Mark Stanovich <mrktimber@gmail.com>, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35.3
Message-ID: <20100821045031.GA3291@suse.de>
References: <AANLkTi=wyG13QOU3EQwaO3qBxY=aR=ftiP4s7YpemrPp@mail.gmail.com> <4C6F4BBB.5040207@zytor.com> <AANLkTi=sKH95tLee+H03ah=8dF6LV9hpw+1esGSZuHRS@mail.gmail.com> <4C6F58DE.1010503@zytor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4C6F58DE.1010503@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 808
Lines: 19

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:41:02PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> OK, I think we can consider this root-caused (it's unclear if it's our
> bug or gcc's, but adding "volatile" to the pointer solves the problem.)
> 
> Greg, do you want to take the listed upstream patches (thus bringing the
> code closer to mainline) or do you want to take the one-liner patch from
> the bugzilla?  [Attached for reference?]

Let me look at the 2 upstream patches tomorrow, and I'd prefer to take
them instead of something else, just to keep everything in sync.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/