Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:29:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:29:07 -0500 Received: from va-ext.webmethods.com ([208.234.160.252]:14680 "EHLO localhost.neuron.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 00:28:56 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:00:29 -0500 (EST) From: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: kapm-idled : is this a bug? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've recently begun testing my laptop on the latest 2.4.0-test12-pre[78] kernels. When freshly booted and nothing producing a load on the system, top reports a process called 'kapm-idled' consuming between 60% an 85% of CPU cycles. If I induce a load on the machine (by recompiling kernel modules, for example), this process slowly loses priotity and stops consuming cycles. Once the compilation is complete, it climbs back up to the top of the stack again. Here are top snapshots taken at about 90 second intervals: PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT LIB %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 3 root 20 0 0 0 0 SW 0 81.7 0.0 1:14 kapm-idled 3 root 20 0 0 0 0 SW 0 76.8 0.0 1:41 kapm-idled * 3 root 9 0 0 0 0 SW 0 0.0 0.0 3:09 kapm-idled 3 root 14 0 0 0 0 SW 0 60.5 0.0 3:39 kapm-idled 3 root 20 0 0 0 0 SW 0 85.7 0.0 5:15 kapm-idled * during re-compilation of kernel modules, kapm-idled was de-prioritized and took up no CPU cycles. after the compilation completed, the task priority increased until it was again consuming hi percentages. I've consistently re-produced this on my Dell Latitude CS laptop. I'm wondering if this will reduce battery life since the CPU is constantly being loaded instead of properly idled. Stewart - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/