Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751485Ab0HVQoF (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:44:05 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56280 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751037Ab0HVQoD (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Aug 2010 12:44:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1282470917.11348.891.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1282391770.29609.1223.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1282460275.11348.865.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1282462386.11348.871.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1282470917.11348.891.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 09:43:29 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] mlock/stack guard interaction fixup To: Ian Campbell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable-review@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Greg KH , Peter Zijlstra , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 16 On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > In the meantime I notice you've committed the patches. Can we get them > queued up for stable backports at some point? I appreciate you might > want them to bake for a bit longer in 2.6.36-rc first. Yeah, I think I want them in -rc2 (which I'll do today) and get some more testing first. The patches are simple, but let's see if I missed anything else for a couple of days. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/