Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753691Ab0HWJhJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:37:09 -0400 Received: from freeflow.nu ([178.79.134.28]:60086 "EHLO freeflow.nu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752087Ab0HWJhH (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:37:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4C724141.8060000@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:37:05 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: Mikael Abrahamsson , Stan Hoeppner , Linux Kernel List , linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman Subject: Re: 2.6.34.1 page allocation failure References: <4C70BFF3.8030507@hardwarefreak.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 848 Lines: 18 On 8/23/10 1:40 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: > >> In Stan's case, it's a order-1 GFP_ATOMIC allocation but there are >> only order-0 pages available. Mel, any recent page allocator fixes in >> 2.6.35 or 2.6.36-rc1 that Stan/Mikael should test? > This is the TCP slab? Best fix would be in the page allocator. However, > in this particular case the slub allocator would be able to fall back to > an order 0 allocation and still satisfy the request. > Looking at the stack trace of the oops, I think Stan has CONFIG_SLAB which doesn't have order-0 fallback. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/