DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=pacbell.net;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=PyaqCOXkAMGp3E1B+0+BEaVfJ0bx8dnJvp9YY1Nzac/odtd83GAab1aPzcIC7UTltII2qQq+xfHGbCwKs65VJVfFWCfSwlrHbU14GhrZh4eLRA7Tc8+s0yocKz5pqq9gDWhRfLozvSU9ArEHk3d3r2zeKAbH4e4jAXi3z+6LcnE=;
Message-ID: <30193.50267.qm@web180305.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pio: add arch specific gpio_is_valid() function
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        bn@niasdigital.com, ryan@bluewatersys.com,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: avictor.za@gmail.com, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1282575669-24501-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 696
Lines: 21


--- On Mon, 8/23/10, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote:

> From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] pio: add arch specific gpio_is_valid() function

What's the rationale?  It's valid or not.  And there's already a
function whose job it is to report that status ... which is set up
for arch customization.  Which ISTR worked fine for AT91 (among other
platforms) ...

So my first reacion is "NAK, pointless".

> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/