Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:25:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:25:30 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:15375 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 19:25:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:25:30 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: "Grover, Andrew" Cc: "'Pavel Machek'" , Brad Hards , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [patch] i386 "General Options" - begone [take 2] Message-ID: <20020605012529.F4751@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , "Grover, Andrew" , 'Pavel Machek' , Brad Hards , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <59885C5E3098D511AD690002A5072D3C02AB7ED9@orsmsx111.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 04:09:48PM -0700, Grover, Andrew wrote: > > Can you confirm that you're not advocating a "ACPI or Legacy" > > approach ? > > I think you're aware of the dragons that lie that way, but I > > want to be sure my suspicions are unfounded. > All I can say is using just *part* of ACPI will cause some machine, > somewhere, to not work. I want to avoid scenarios where that happens. If > there are issues with that, can we discuss them asap, perhaps now? Think vendor kernel. There we want to run on ancient pre-ACPI boxes, and super duper new box with borken/non-existant legacy tables. So just keep in mind that compiling both into the kernel is a must have requirement. Dave. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/