Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 23:56:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 23:56:56 -0400 Received: from flrtn-4-m1-42.vnnyca.adelphia.net ([24.55.69.42]:31642 "EHLO jyro.mirai.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 4 Jun 2002 23:56:55 -0400 Message-ID: <3CFD8C07.6030607@tmsusa.com> Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 20:56:55 -0700 From: J Sloan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020604 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Phillips CC: linux kernel Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Daniel Phillips wrote: >If I recall correctly, XFS makes an attempt to provide such realtime >guarantees, or at least the Solaris version does. > When did Solaris ever support xfs? > However, the operating >system must be able to provide true realtime guarantees in order for the >filesystem to provide them, and I doubt that the combination of XFS and >Solaris can do that. > no, but the combination of xfs and irix has made a lot of folks happy - and xfs/linux is coming along nicely as well... Joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/