Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 03:36:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 03:36:45 -0400 Received: from argo.anu.edu.au ([150.203.5.57]:23681 "HELO argo.anu.edu.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 03:36:45 -0400 From: "Roger W. Brown" Reply-To: bregor@anusf.anu.edu.au Organization: Australian National University To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Definition conflict in 2.4.19-pre?? code Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 17:36:45 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200206051736.45920.bregor@sf.anu.edu.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I am not able to compile 2.4 series kernels after linux-2.4.19-pre1 and I don't understand how others can ! Consider the "struct request_queue" definition in blkdev.h In the 2.4.19-pre1 version, the last few lines read: /* * Tasks wait here for free read and write requests */ wait_queue_head_t wait_for_requests[2]; }; and for later versions this is changed to: /* * Tasks wait here for free request */ wait_queue_head_t wait_for_request; }; yet drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c still makes references to wait_for_requests[?] in the void blk_init_free_list() and blkdev_release_request() functions and elsewhere. Roger -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/