Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754064Ab0HYQDe (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:03:34 -0400 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:32929 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752522Ab0HYQD1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:03:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4C753D75.2010305@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:57:41 +0200 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig , jack@suse.cz CC: jaxboe@fusionio.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@suse.de, tytso@mit.edu, chris.mason@oracle.com, swhiteho@redhat.com, konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp, dm-devel@redhat.com, vst@vlnb.net, rwheeler@redhat.com, hare@suse.de, neilb@suse.de, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, mst@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org, snitzer@redhat.com, k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers References: <1282751267-3530-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1282751267-3530-27-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20100825155842.GA3229@lst.de> <20100825160032.GC3229@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20100825160032.GC3229@lst.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (hera.kernel.org [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 942 Lines: 25 On 08/25/2010 06:00 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:58:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> From: Christoph Hellwig >>> >>> ext4 already uses synchronous discards, no need to add I/O barriers. >> >> This needs the patch that Jan sent in reply to my initial version merged >> into it. > > Actually the jbd2 patch needs it merged, but the point still stands. Yeah, wasn't sure about that one. Has anyone tested it? I'll be happy to merge it but I have no idea whether it's correct or not and Jan didn't seem to have tested it so... Jan, shall I merge the patch? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/