Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 06:35:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 06:35:53 -0400 Received: from vasquez.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.41]:17156 "EHLO vasquez.zip.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 06:35:51 -0400 Message-ID: <3CFDEA79.2980BF8D@zip.com.au> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 03:39:53 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre9 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Xavier Bestel CC: Andreas Dilger , lkml Subject: Re: [rfc] "laptop mode" In-Reply-To: <3CFD50B9.259366F4@zip.com.au> <1023272806.15438.106.camel@bip> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Xavier Bestel wrote: > > Le mer 05/06/2002 ? 01:43, Andrew Morton a ?crit : > > > Also, it has been suggested that the feature become more fully-fleshed, > > to support desktops with one disk spun down, etc. It's not really > > rocket science to do that - the `struct backing_dev_info' gives > > a specific communication channel between the high-level VFS code and > > the request queue. But that would require significantly more surgery > > against the writeback code, so I'm fishing for requirements here. If > > the current (simple) patch is sufficient then, well, it is sufficient. > > Have per-disk laptop-mode, so that some user-mode proggy (e.g. hotplug) > could decide what to do. But why? - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/