Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753487Ab0HZMfQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:35:16 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46788 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751582Ab0HZMfN (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:35:13 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] V4L/DVB: mantis: Fix IR_CORE dependency Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:34:55 +0200 Organization: m Message-ID: <87aao9y2kw.fsf@nemi.mork.no> References: <4C643A08.3000605@redhat.com> <20100824084528.GA26618@elte.hu> <4C73E46B.8050203@oracle.com> <20100824193039.GA20425@elte.hu> <4C743D2E.7090803@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.160.199.2 User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EtsOOOe3ujoP9DGxwnvQD8p9pTs= Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1476 Lines: 28 I wonder, am I really the only one who find it somewhat strange that it's necessary to break the mantis driver by doing changes to code which is not used at all? Yes, mantis_input.c may be linked into mantis_core, so it is capable of breaking the build, but there is *nothing* calling the code. IMHO mantis_input.c should be removed unless it can be fixed up enough to be enabled, but one would have to know why it was disabled in the first place to do that. Dead code can always be ressurrected later if someone is willing to work on it. This completely unnecessary dependency bug gives you at least one good reason why keeping dead code is bad. (Keeping the code might have been considered if it was likely to be used in the near future, but this is not the case given that you do not currently accept any patches actually improving the mantis driver.) It's not that this bug is so bad or nothing. I'm just puzzled by your development priorities, which is the direct cause of this bug. Let me know if you are going to start accepting patches for the mantis driver (the best way is by doing something with the patches already posted), and I will prepare and test a patch removing mantis_input.c Just my €0.02 Bjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/