Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:51:35 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
        Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, david@lang.hm,
        linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        arve@android.com, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, florian@mickler.org,
        rjw@sisk.pl, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, peterz@infradead.org,
        tglx@linutronix.de, menage@google.com, david-b@pacbell.net,
        James.Bottomley@suse.de, arjan@infradead.org, swmike@swm.pp.se,
        galibert@pobox.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Attempted summary of suspend-blockers LKML thread, take three
Message-ID: <20100828085135.GA2711@ucw.cz>
References: <AANLkTinVV1NVHFPeO0p_e2pCtNwTNB932q9tbu9MMD3_@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100812034435.GA7403@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <AANLkTi=RD=eM_gpc7FfRq0923sUbARmZ2+4-m+fLibYC@mail.gmail.com>
 <E3F3D3E1-4DF7-47E3-895D-95F6BC22CCC4@mit.edu>
 <AANLkTikcoWfmL-XfYbFeYdVtU9GC6_LtVSSB2H6GcedA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100812174303.GD2524@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <AANLkTim1U6QpRyfwYCq2uRA=7-a8ryfDrzv5VCqmHnyB@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTinNxZoMab=tG9KXJ9n_nxB1dXHkfk-7xUMWXACW@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTin3H0o+WQocUYjUcPGRpkRqK9H2LJ0OwHXFNBdj@mail.gmail.com>
 <20100813144236.GB2511@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100813144236.GB2511@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1249
Lines: 32

Hi!

> > You are *one* user of the kernel. Let's suppose Android wasn't using
> > suspend-blockers, and there was another equally successful linux
> > mobile platform, Foobingo, and they were using them, and they were the
> > only ones interested on implementing them.
> > 
> > What does that change? Nothing. They still need to convince the
> > community that what they are proposing to be merged is actually
> > useful, and somebody will use it. If not, they can just keep the patch
> > for themselves until they do. I don't see the big deal.
> 
> So the current users of the Linux kernel are the following?
> 
> o	GNU/Linux
> o	Android
> 
> Do any other distributions or devices with unusual user-space layouts
> qualify?

QTembedded distros are somehow similar to android (one big binary).

Then there's minor stuff, like webOS and Motorola A1200...
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/