Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753474Ab0H1SLL (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:11:11 -0400 Received: from n3c.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([76.13.13.80]:26111 "HELO n3c.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753312Ab0H1SLJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:11:09 -0400 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 247962.34683.bm@omp123.mail.gq1.yahoo.com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=t+9JOzVFJNEkGLD8a6WzAuAfp0YblgxxZo293+mgnYeubEt3IB2K/0ajrU3fcU2GA/cPT3vk/UlyvB2g9JH32nxGmz1L3vrkSM45OeFPn8ye2NYjVi+W6mqX/kZWwP2dmlzpe6Tr8gYW1vqPgvPRF+13V0tkmnKUAZvJH0CQKNw=; Message-ID: <620873.86430.qm@web180307.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: fwrL2OMVM1nLK9Rmpo0QGR.a7Zq_cRBP_ehnBYcmSZ3ZNmG 7wEvvxB_rhW0EHPNiBgUD4gCduGAA44vs5LNKUjnHKUZzDvn.JgrSlmjUIp_ sPawQYVYb8HktjFXsDuCueyLIlRtXFf3jI7RNP.WbPO0QK1eCSrMjhSBefj3 ohjrbwt41iWQkCwssPUs74DBXuz_q6mOmsjjAqyQ7A9UOX9HuQSdrgF9Bx4v ePSj.1j_kLss9TJbt4wChJkiVwP6Jzr1PJWTm.PasV6S9HFCjU9ShQ4tk55u dSbno_GZIqNr2F22yj1IygsbJbyYR6Gl.8292Ca8ARGaZfQTr9_nMsTwC3qw ZSnt4CbRLhf8- X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.3.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 11:11:07 -0700 (PDT) From: David Brownell Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] drivers/usb/gadget: Remove double test To: Stefan Richter , Julia Lawall Cc: Thomas Dahlmann , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, David Brownell , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-geode@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1971 Lines: 65 --- On Sat, 8/28/10, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] drivers/usb/gadget: Remove double test > To: "Stefan Richter" > Cc: "David Brownell" , "Thomas Dahlmann" , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "David Brownell" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , linux-geode@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Date: Saturday, August 28, 2010, 10:17 AM > On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, Stefan Richter > wrote: > > > Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, David Brownell wrote: > > > > > >> Please update $SUBJECT to say which driver > is > > >> affected; > > > > > > Done. Thanks. Unless the author/maintainer of this driver objects, the patch is OK by me. > > > > > >> it's not everything in that directory, > > >> and accurate GIT summaries help a lot. > > > > > > Is there some sort of rule that can be > followed?? Don't be misleading ... Generally, if it updates just one driver, mention that driver in $SUBJECT. Only say the subsystem itself is being updated (which your original $SUBJECT did) when the patch affects framework code, that's shared by all drivers, ?> > > What if the > > > patch affects only two files? Which two files? The "patch updates one thing" rule will then cause it to affect only one driver (usually) or some framework issue, so the above policies kick in directly. Rarely there will be bugs repeated (e.g. via cut/paste) in multiple drivers, ... in which case it can make sense to summarize a patch as a multi-driver subsystem fix . Similarly with API changes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/