Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753829Ab0H3HgM (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:36:12 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:53782 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753696Ab0H3HgK (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:36:10 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ChV+65Me1MUKxUZcB/qwmVqwr97FvI5njCJaiheQgiAbDh5yQGHnCG4PSAFioU1Fad UpTjtWTozIlxaWFDd0kxuHOq+NX0kySGTyDo9J9FXz2JzFFwzgSS91Y6by0IAcNYMnJ5 YZPS3GeTDcx3LME5DorHm65iA34Z2RybrStwk= Message-ID: <4C7B5F64.30205@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:36:04 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; cs-CZ; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 SUSE/3.1.2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Hancock CC: Jiri Slaby , Matthew Garrett , lenb@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: pci_irq, add PRT_ quirk for IBM Bartolo References: <1277673679-21458-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <4C27E965.80508@gmail.com> <4C283D84.6080504@suse.cz> <20100628171410.GA27367@srcf.ucam.org> <4C290245.2040001@suse.cz> <20100628204820.GA32503@srcf.ucam.org> <4C2A3E27.4060407@suse.cz> <4C2B0C73.9050200@suse.cz> <4C3278C8.60503@gmail.com> <4C447D6D.5060801@suse.cz> <4C456C69.60606@suse.cz> <4C737E9F.7060107@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1108 Lines: 33 On 08/25/2010 01:25 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote: >> So, to sum up: >> 1) acpi routing enabled (no kernel parameter) => ports 4+5 defunct. >> ports 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 11 >> >> 2) acpi routing disabled (acpi=noirq) => all ports working, 4+5 on irq >> 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >> >> 3) with the quirk [1] and acpi routing enabled => all ports working, >> ports 4+5 on irq 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >> >> 4) in windows => 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 9 and the ports are all working. >> >> Any ideas what this means? Especially point 4)? >> >> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/27/85 > > I think that's the key question. Is Windows actually using ACPI on > that machine at all? (Check the computer type in Device Manager and > see if it mentions ACPI.) Yes, there is Computer->ACPI PC. thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/