MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:45:53 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTi==im4bxnn9Ga2-ukUCiKdzQETHahcgvEj0Sef6@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: usage of kill_pid and family
From: Pavan Savoy <pavan_savoy@sify.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1009
Lines: 24

Hi,

I use kill_pid in one of our drivers to signal a user-space daemon to
perform a particular action (open-UART for instance), I recently ran
into problems with permissions as to when a user with stranger UID
started open up a device, which internally calls the kill_pid in that
context, could not send the signal and returned with "permission
denied".

I started using kill_pid_info_as_uid and sent signals as UID 0 to
solve the problem, it did solve the problem, but is this the right
approach?

Also why is not suggested to use kill_pid and family to communicate
with user-space? (namespace issues??- what do they mean?)

Note:
I get the PID of the process which receives signal from one of the
sysfs entries created by driver, but filled up by the daemon...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/