Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754239Ab0H3UuT (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:50:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:4709 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754122Ab0H3UuR (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:50:17 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <4C7B59E1.6010904@snapgear.com> References: <4C7B59E1.6010904@snapgear.com> <20100827015905.27277.39167.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20100827020038.27277.27239.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Greg Ungerer Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] Fix M68K irqflags Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:50:11 +0100 Message-ID: <26799.1283201411@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 583 Lines: 15 Greg Ungerer wrote: > I have no problem with the changes as such. But I would rather > not have separate mm and no headers if we can avoid it. Well, I can roll the headers into one, but then it'll be much more #ifdef'd if you're okay with that. The IRQ handling seems sufficiently different to warrant that. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/