Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752256Ab0HaQAl (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:00:41 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34641 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750909Ab0HaQAj (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:00:39 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20100827015905.27277.39167.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20100827020038.27277.27239.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <4C7B59E1.6010904@snapgear.com> <26799.1283201411@redhat.com> To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Greg Ungerer , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] Fix M68K irqflags Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:00:15 +0100 Message-ID: <11403.1283270415@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 681 Lines: 17 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Indeed, m68k doesn't use generic hardirqs yet, m68knommu does. That's orthogonal to this patch series, however. I'm dealing with IRQ flags management, not hardirq support. Out of interest, will the m68knommu arch be integrated into the m68k arch at some point? It's certainly possible to have an arch that is bimodal in this aspect (FRV has CONFIG_MMU as a config option). David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/