Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755447Ab0HaU2T (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:28:19 -0400 Received: from swm.pp.se ([212.247.200.143]:37843 "EHLO uplift.swm.pp.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754243Ab0HaU2R (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:28:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:28:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Pekka Enberg cc: Stan Hoeppner , Christoph Lameter , Linux Kernel List , linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman , Linux Netdev List Subject: Re: 2.6.34.1 page allocation failure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4C70BFF3.8030507@hardwarefreak.com> <4C724141.8060000@kernel.org> <4C72F7C6.3020109@hardwarefreak.com> <4C74097A.5020504@kernel.org> <4C7A3B1D.7050500@kernel.org> <4C7A5DDE.8030106@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1441 Lines: 33 On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: > >> There aren't any debug options that need to be enabled. The reason I'm >> asking is because we had a bunch of similar issues being reported earlier >> that got fixed and it's been calm for a while. That's why it would be >> interesting to know if 2.6.35 or 2.6.36-rc2 (if it's not too unstable to >> test) fixes things. > > Oki, I have installed 2.6.35 now (found backport from ubuntu 10.10 for > 10.04), just need to do a reboot at some convenient time. I just rebooted and ran a similar load of network+disk load that made the machine give "swapper allocation failure" messages before, and I couldn't reproduce it with 2.6.35: 2.6.35-19-generic #25~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 25 03:50:05 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux Doing "sync" in the middle made sync take more than 5+ minutes to complete (2 hung-task messages in dmesg), but at least nothing ran out of memory. Considering the amount of people running 2.6.32 and who will be running it in the future, it still worries me that this is present in 2.6.32 (and earlier kernels as well). -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/