Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754191Ab0KAIFx (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 04:05:53 -0400 Received: from slowhand.arndnet.de ([88.198.19.76]:40308 "EHLO mail.unitix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751690Ab0KAIFv (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Nov 2010 04:05:51 -0400 Message-ID: <4CCE74DB.8000206@arndnet.de> Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:05:47 +0100 From: Arnd Hannemann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ohad Ben-Cohen CC: "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: regression: b43-sdio: probe of mmc0:0001:1 failed with error -16 References: <4CCDA454.708@arndnet.de> <4CCDE4EB.7060001@arndnet.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3394 Lines: 61 Am 01.11.2010 05:50, schrieb Ohad Ben-Cohen: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Arnd Hannemann wrote: >>> In Daniel's scenario, mmc_sdio_init_card() fails because >>> mmc_send_relative_addr() returns -110. >>> >>> Can you please check out if that's the same thing you have too ? >> >> No, it seems to be the pm_runtime_get_sync in sdio_bus.c::sdio_bus_probe(). > > Yeah, this is just the symptom though - pm_runtime_get_sync tries to > power up the card, and eventually mmc_sdio_init_card() is called (by > mmc_sdio_resume which is invoked by mmc_resume_host). No, actually mmc_sdio_init_card() is called _before_ sdio_bus_probe and the failing pm_runtime_get_sync in my case. Also mmd_sdio_resume is not called at all. > On the XO-1.5 mmc_sdio_init_card() seems to fail due to > mmc_send_relative_addr() returning -110; this may suggest that > although mmc_power_off() and mmc_power_on() were called, we still > didn't have a full power reset, and the card/controller are left at a > weird state. > > Can you please check out if that's the same failure in your case too ? No mmc_send_relative_addr() does _not_ return -110, actually it is not called at all. I inserted a WARN_ON() in sdio_bus_probe, and here is the backtrace I get: [ 32.351562] [] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x2c) from [] (sdio_bus_probe+0x5c/0xe8) [ 32.359375] [] (sdio_bus_probe+0x0/0xe8) from [] (driver_probe_device+0xd0/0x18c) [ 32.367187] r8:c00250c4 r7:bf12a210 r6:bf12a210 r5:c728dc3c r4:c728dc08 [ 32.367187] r3:c017eeec [ 32.375000] [] (driver_probe_device+0x0/0x18c) from [] (__driver_attach+0x68/0x8c) [ 32.382812] r7:00000000 r6:bf12a210 r5:c728dc3c r4:c728dc08 [ 32.390625] [] (__driver_attach+0x0/0x8c) from [] (bus_for_each_dev+0x54/0x84) [ 32.398437] r6:00000000 r5:c014e9c4 r4:bf12a210 r3:00000000 [ 32.406250] [] (bus_for_each_dev+0x0/0x84) from [] (driver_attach+0x20/0x28) [ 32.414062] r6:c02b9440 r5:c72bf2c0 r4:bf12a210 [ 32.414062] [] (driver_attach+0x0/0x28) from [] (bus_add_driver+0xa8/0x21c) [ 32.421875] [] (bus_add_driver+0x0/0x21c) from [] (driver_register+0xb0/0x140) [ 32.429687] [] (driver_register+0x0/0x140) from [] (sdio_register_driver+0x24/0x2c) [ 32.437500] r8:c00250c4 r7:00000000 r6:0001cfe0 r5:bf132000 r4:bf12a714 [ 32.445312] r3:c02b9440 [ 32.445312] [] (sdio_register_driver+0x0/0x2c) from [] (b43_sdio_init+0x14/0x1c [b43]) [ 32.453125] [] (b43_sdio_init+0x0/0x1c [b43]) from [] (b43_init+0x18/0x88 [b43]) [ 32.460937] [] (b43_init+0x0/0x88 [b43]) from [] (do_one_initcall+0xd4/0x1a8) [ 32.468750] r4:bf12a714 [ 32.468750] [] (do_one_initcall+0x0/0x1a8) from [] (sys_init_module+0x9c/0x1b4) [ 32.476562] [] (sys_init_module+0x0/0x1b4) from [] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x30) [ 32.484375] r7:00000080 r6:00000000 r5:00000000 r4:0001b070 [ 32.492187] ---[ end trace cb2ed4a07515af72 ]--- Regards, Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/