Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753977Ab0KCHjJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2010 03:39:09 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:52792 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753378Ab0KCHjH (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2010 03:39:07 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=RtsMwIrhykOE3TqVwiS44yMijJm2rKdbR8GUfna1jZ7VD3CWVxN9vSXwjEvsrBiuup d0Eu8qWBd1J3YThXfKMdQ/dFRYd2JMZ3r7fFp55x8fMfy7eqCFc2FZE4lb5hKhVjskwA JGjJlhT1ZRiZfXQd7dSs+JxuL982sghaD2SJo= Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 07:38:54 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Denys Fedoryshchenko Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Paul Mackerras , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.35->2.6.36 regression, vanilla kernel panic, ppp or hrtimers crashing Message-ID: <20101103073854.GA7279@ff.dom.local> References: <20101028070550.GA7647@ff.dom.local> <201011021549.47466.nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201011021549.47466.nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1911 Lines: 54 On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 03:49:47PM +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > I didn't try yet, but i enable more debugs and catch linked list corruption. It should be very useful but it seems there were no significant changes in ppp locking between 2.6.35 and .36 except the patch I mentioned, so it would be nice to check this first and try to fix it properly later. Jarek P. > > Here is dumps from netconsole: > http://www.nuclearcat.com/ll.txt > http://www.nuclearcat.com/ll2.txt > > I have another PC, also fails to run 2.6.36, but netconsole don't give > anything. > Both PC's have strange issue with clock drifting away too much (on 2.6.35 and > maybe even before). > > > On Thursday 28 October 2010 10:05:50 Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > On 2010-10-25 11:22, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > Here is what i got from netconsole > > > > > > [ 259.238755] BUG: unable to handle kernel > > > paging request > > > at f8ba001c > > > [ 259.238953] IP: > > > [] do_select+0x2cc/0x502 > > > > ... > > > > > It is not easy to do full git bisect(it is semi-embedded distro), but i > > > can try reversing particular commits, if someone can give idea which > > > one, and can try debug patches. > > > > Hi, > > Nothing concrete, but you might try reverting this one: > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.36.y.git;a=commi > > tdiff;h=15fd0cd9a2ad24a78fbee369dec8ca660979d57e > > > > Jarek P. > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/