Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755121Ab0KCKX4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:23:56 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:39803 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754137Ab0KCKXx (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2010 06:23:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:23:52 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Michael Tokarev Cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: bind-mount vs second mount of the same blockdev? Message-ID: <20101103102352.GB19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <4CD12DED.3010902@msgid.tls.msk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CD12DED.3010902@msgid.tls.msk.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 552 Lines: 19 On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:39:57PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > mount -t ext3 /dev/block /mnt/a > mount --bind /mnt/a /mnt/b > > versus > > mount -t ext3 /dev/block /mnt/a > mount -t ext3 /dev/block /mnt/b [snip] > What are the differences in behavour? None. Both lead to the identical states. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/