Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755666Ab0KCPBe (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:01:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230]:57333 "EHLO mgw-mx03.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755582Ab0KCPBb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:01:31 -0400 From: To: , CC: , , , Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:00:20 +0100 Subject: RE: sysfs and power management Thread-Topic: sysfs and power management Thread-Index: Act7WIBJDVScD7hwSyOBsh42/gpu2QADyDjw Message-ID: <62697B07E9803846BC582181BD6FB6B836EB55F0AD@NOK-EUMSG-02.mgdnok.nokia.com> References: <62697B07E9803846BC582181BD6FB6B836EB2994F4@NOK-EUMSG-02.mgdnok.nokia.com> <20101027152809.39701917@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20101029195039.GA26401@suse.de> <20101030140047.GA24464@khazad-dum.debian.net> <1288526275.2313.14.camel@noppispoppis.nmp.nokia.com> <20101031142539.GA25480@suse.de> <1288608087.26073.6.camel@4fid08082> <20101101165701.2fc30368@linux.intel.com> <20101101180740.GA17148@suse.de> <20101103094452.0cfae4ec@linux.intel.com> <20101103130925.GA15885@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20101103130925.GA15885@suse.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2010 15:00:21.0962 (UTC) FILETIME=[D66EBAA0:01CB7B67] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2048 Lines: 59 >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@suse.de] >Sent: 03 November, 2010 15:09 >To: Alan Cox >Cc: Onkalo Samu.P (Nokia-MS/Tampere); ext Henrique de Moraes Holschuh; >Alan Cox; akpm@linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: sysfs and power management > >On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:44:52AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:07:40 -0700 >> Greg KH wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 04:57:01PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: >> > > > I took a look to that. It seems that iio is more or less sysfs >> > > > based. There are ring buffers and event device which are chardev >> > > > based but still the data outside ring buffer and the control is >> > > > sysfs based. >> > > >> > > IIO is sysfs dependant, heavyweight and makes no sense for some of >> > > the sysfs based drivers. IIO is also staging based and Linus >> > > already threw out the last attempt to unify these drivers sanely >> > > with an ALS layer - which was smaller, cleaner and better ! >> > >> > I think we need to revisit this issue again, before iio is merged to >> > the main kernel tree. I've been totally ignoring the iio >user/kernel >> > api at the moment, waiting for things to settle down there >> >> Actually I think there is another way to do it cleanly >> >> Keep a flag per device (or per runtime pm struct of device) >> >> And on the open/close do >> >> if (runtime_pm on device && device has SYSFS_PM set) >> pm_runtime_foo >> >> so that devices that need to be powered up to handle sysfs requests >can >> set a single flag and just work. > >That sounds like a reasonable idea. > I'm working with the implementation which adds possibility to add per attribute open_close_notification method with minimal overhead to current system. -Samu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/