Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S130008AbQLKPrR>; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:47:17 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129778AbQLKPrH>; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:47:07 -0500
Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:13310 "EHLO
	brutus.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S130008AbQLKPq4>; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:46:56 -0500
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:16:00 -0200 (BRDT)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: stewart@neuron.com
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012111151470.2070-100000@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012111315350.4808-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 stewart@neuron.com wrote:

	[snip whine]

>  I've consistently re-produced this on my Dell Latitude CS laptop. I'm
>  wondering if this will reduce battery life since the CPU is constantly
>  being loaded instead of properly idled.

What do you suppose the 'idled' in 'kapm-idled' stands for?

Rik
--
Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
	Trailer at 11.

		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com.br/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/